› http://en.wordpress.com/tag/parental-alienation/

Mother Makes Children Pay Rent To See Their Father

My children's mother wants to rent our children to me. Only they are the ones that are paying for it.

Thomas J. Nixon Transfered to the Courthouse in Alameda

Thomas J. Nixon has been transfered to The George E. McDonald Hall of Justice
2233 Shore Line Dr, Alameda, California

http://fathersrightsadvocate.blogspot.com/?m=1

http://towardchange.wordpress.com/2013/02/03/parental-alienation/

http://en.wordpress.com/tag/parental-alienation-and-parental-alienation-syndrome/

http://parentalalienation.blogspot.com/?m=1

http://www.parentalalienationcrisis.org/blog.asp

http://en.wordpress.com/tag/parental-alienation/

http://en.wordpress.com/tag/parental-alienation/

http://afamilysheartbreak.com/blog/

Tortious Interference of Visitation

IV. INTERFERENCE WITH VISITATION Following a divorce, it is often the case that the noncustodial parent's only connection with his or her child is the right to visitation. Thus, a denial of visitation for any substantial period of time could work to remove the noncustodial parent from even the memory of the young child. For this and other reasons, some courts have recognized the tort of interference with visitation rights, or intentional infliction of emotional distress, when the custodial parent or others interfere with the noncustodial parent's right to visitation. One court held that the defendants could be held liable for the tort of interference with visitation and intentional infliction of emotional distress in Brown v. Denny, 72 Ohio App. 3d 417, 594 N.E.2d 1008 (1991). In Brown, the husband and wife divorced in 1985. Pursuant to the divorce decree, the wife was awarded custody of the children, and the husband was awarded supervised visitation. In 1987, the court ordered the wife to allow the children to visit with the husband from August 10, 1987 until August 14, 1987. Instead of allowing the children to attend their visitation, the wife's parents took the wife and the children to the wife's parents' home in Tennessee. The husband filed a claim against the maternal grandparents, alleging that the maternal grandparents had interfered with the husband's visitation rights and committed intentional infliction of emotional distress. The trial court granted the maternal grandparents a directed verdict, and the husband appealed. The Ohio Court of Appeals first held that, pursuant to a statute in Ohio, the defendants could be held liable for interference with visitation. 594 N.E.2d at 1011-12. Next, the court held that the maternal grandparents could be held liable for the common-law tort of intentional infliction of emotional distress for their interference with the husband's custody rights. Interestingly, the only fact cited by the court for its decision that the maternal grandparents could be held liable by a jury for intentional infliction of emotional distress was that the grandparents "decided to support their daughter in her decision to violate a visitation order issued by a domestic relations court, and thereby to frustrate [the husband's] desire to enjoy his visitation rights." Id. at 1012. Thus, even without other facts that indicate "outrageousness," if a person simply promotes the violation of a visitation order, he may be held liable for intentional infliction of emotional distress in Ohio. See also Ruffalo v. United States, 590 F. Supp. 70 (W.D. Mo. 1984) (federal government was liable for interfering with the mother's visitation rights by discouraging the father, who was in the federal Witness Protection Program, from allowing the mother to visit with the child). But see R.J. v. S.L.J., 810 S.W.2d 608 (Mo. Ct. App. 1991) (father could maintain no action for intentional infliction of emotional distress against the wife). In contrast to the decision in Ohio, most other courts that have determined that the defendant could be held liable for violating the noncustodial parent's right to visitation have determined that the defendant could only be subject to liability if he has concealed the child for a long period of time or has committed some other egregious act. For example, the maternal grandparents were held liable for intentional infliction of emotional distress after they assisted their daughter's attempt to completely disappear with the child in Pankratz v. Willis, 155 Ariz. 8, 744 P.2d 1182 (1987). In Pankratz, the wife married the husband in 1979. Shortly thereafter, the marriage produced a daughter. In 1981 and 1982, the husband and wife engaged in a protracted custody battle. In December 1982, the wife was awarded custody of the minor child, and the husband was awarded visitation. However, the tensions between the former spouses continued. In 1983, while the wife and the child were at a motel near Disneyland, the wife called her parents and informed them that she would not return home. Subsequently, the wife and the child disappeared, and had not been located at the time the husband filed a civil action against the maternal grandparents. In his complaint, the husband alleged that the wife was financially and emotionally dependent on her parents, and that the parents had enabled the wife and child to completely disappear, causing him extreme emotional distress. The husband noted that the wife had never supported herself, the grandparents paid the wife's attorney's fees for the divorce proceeding, the wife resided with the grandparents during the separation, the wife deposited all of her funds into her parents' checking account, and the wife had called her parents from Geneva, Switzerland around the time that she disappeared. In fact, the wife had called her parents seven times since the day she disappeared with the child. In addition, the husb read more...and presented evidence that he had suffered emotional distress following the disappearance. 744 P.2d at 1186. Based upon this evidence, the trial court let stand a jury award of $125,000 against the maternal grandparents, and the grandparents appealed. On appeal to the Court of Appeals of Arizona, the grandparents alleged that they had not intentionally or recklessly committed outrageous acts, and that the husband had not suffered distress. However, the court of appeals held that the jury could have reasonably found the defendants liable. The wife was completely dependent upon her parents for financial resources, and, thus, the jury could have concluded that the grandparents financially assisted in the disappearance. Also, the evidence indicated that the grandfather was hostile to the husband and encouraged the wife to disappear. The court concluded that these facts indicated that the grandparents had intentionally committed outrageous acts. Id.at 1189. Because the evidence also indicated that the husband had suffered emotional distress as a result of the grandparents' conduct, the decision by the trial court to award damages to the husband was affirmed. Thus, if a defendant assists in the complete disappearance of the child, he may be held liable to a parent who has visitation rights for intentional infliction of emotional distress. In addition, a custodial parent could be held liable for the creation of a negative relationship between the noncustodial parent and the child. The court reached this conclusion in Bhama v. Bhama, 169 Mich. App. 73, 425 N.W.2d 733 (1988). In Bhama, the parties were divorced in 1977. The wife was awarded custody of the parties' children. In 1982, this decree was modified, and the court awarded custody to the husband. In 1986, the wife filed a claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress, alleging that the husband had used his psychiatric training in order to "`systematically manipulate, instigate, involuntarily convert, intimidate, indoctrinate and brainwash the minor children into totally rejecting' her to `the point of extreme antagonism and instilled hatred.'" 425 N.W.2d at 734. The trial court ruled for the husband, concluding that "the creation of negative relationships does not amount to outrageous conduct." Id. The wife appealed. On appeal, the decision by the trial court to summarily dismiss the wife's claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress was overruled. In entering this decision, the Court of Appeals of Michigan concluded that the "abuse of a relationship" could be considered outrageous conduct which would justify an award to the wife. Id. at 736. Thus, if the custodial parent manipulates a child in order to create a negative relationship between the noncustodial parent and the child, the custodial parent could be held liable for intentional infliction of emotional distress. See also Raferty v. Scott, 756 F.2d 335 (4th Cir. 1985) (wife was liable for intentional infliction of emotional distress where she successfully destroyed the relationship between the husband and the child); Hershey v. Hershey, 467 N.W.2d 484 (S.D. 1991) (custodial parent could be held liable where she prevented the father from visiting with the child for many years). Although some courts have held that defendants could be held liable for interfering with visitation or creating a negative relationship between the noncustodial parent and the child, other courts have simply refused to recognize claims by parents who only have rights to visitation. One recent case where the court refused to recognize any claim by the noncustodial parent was Cosner v. Ridinger, 882 P.2d 1243 (Wyo. 1994). In Cosner, the wife gave birth to a child in 1980. The husband and wife divorced in 1982. Pursuant to the divorce decree, the wife was awarded custody of the child, and the husband was granted visitation rights. In March 1993, the husband filed a claim against the wife and other third parties, alleging that they had intentionally interfered with his

Throwaway Dads: The Myths and Barriers That Keep Men from Being the Fathers They Want to Be

http://www.amazon.com/Throwaway-Dads-Myths-Barriers-Fathers/dp/B000GG4JMS

Severe Alienaton

Be Professional. 1.Have Court Order

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G3r9RCibZ8M&feature=youtube_gdata_player

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yYi3qGR35pc&feature=youtube_gdata_player

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pfwYIkLahbc&feature=youtube_gdata_player

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QGpz5YkAdJw&feature=youtube_gdata_player

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DqSsl6FfJCE&feature=youtube_gdata_player

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bpk1zHSLfD8&feature=youtube_gdata_player

Robin Silverman

Do not agree to any mediation with this. It is a man hater and will coerse you by manipulation so Thomas Nixon can do nothing as usual.

The Mediators Office

This is the courtroom.

Coersion

Legal Abuse

Deceptive Practice

Domestic Violence

Emotional Abuse

THOMAS J. NIXON

commissioner

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ikouCKUwQ1Y&feature=youtube_gdata_player

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pgWd4DVYHR4&feature=youtube_gdata_player

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y-WAHgQSHtA&feature=youtube_gdata_player

http://ccs.dogpile.com/ClickHandler.ashx?du=www.alameda.courts.ca.gov%2fPages.aspx%2f2001-12-14&ru=http%3a%2f%2fwww.alameda.courts.ca.gov%2fPages.aspx%2f2001-12-14&ld=20130809&ap=7&app=1&c=info.dogpl&s=dogpile&coi=771&cop=main-title&euip=174.141.208.106&npp=7&p=0&pp=0&pvaid=c2030abc9195425da385a23807707270&sid=1830193568.2710433719406.1376053241&vid=1830193568.2710433719406.1371739360.293&fcoi=417&fcop=topnav&fct.uid=ae70130d96ce442b889d3d00fd3a6830&fpid=27&ep=7&mid=9&en=0WEFU%2fZhSoQrR2QhC9ngyiLWjD1jFApuQYQAxZ4xeD8Qp%2frmUICm1Q%3d%3d&hash=6293D75A807E132F63100AA3AED5A6A3

thomas j. nixon commissioner

http://www.endparentalalienation.com/End_Parental_Alienation/Welcome.html

Family Law Commissioners and Judges Do Not Know What is Best

Every family is different. Sure most have the same intentions to be model citizens  raise little Johnny or Susie  and do the rite thing. But personalities egos and behaviors can change all this.
Just as case that is seen in Family Court is different, they can't possibly know what is best for Johnny or Susie when they don't even care where they live or who they live with.

Create A Website for your Child/Children

When parental alienation tactics are used to brainwash your child you need a unique approach to communicate your love to them. This is why we strongly believe you should create a website for your alienated child. Because the overwhelming majority of alienating parents are also the custodial parents, they have a distinct advantage over targeted parents in the lives of their children due to the sheer amount of hours they spend with their child. It is fairly easy to brainwash the children into believing that they are the "good parent" and you are the "bad" if you aren't around to let your life and love show your children who you really are… Grandparents are especially vulnerable to these attacks because the alienating parent can't afford to allow anyone that might present the other parent in a positive light in the children's lives. We put our site up live in August of 2004. According to my ex-wife, my sons found the site one year later in June of 2005. Through various monitoring tools we have been able to determine that the boys have visited the site quite regularly in the last several year. Feel free to browse around our website for ideas for your child's site. (This embedded website is fully functional - you can look at my entire website by using the menu and scroll bars - If you would like to see it in the full screen version go to www.nischalke.com

The Lonely Father

Being abandoned and or alienated by your family can be a very tramatic experience.

Spies

A "custodial" mother interferes with a bonding time with the father by texting the child, and the child texting back.

Children suffering damages from narcissistic parent

Deception - What They Don't Know, Will and Is Hurting Them For A Long Time To Come

There are many disturbances that make up Parent Child Alienation.
One of them is the parent who has the children as a so called
"custodial parent" is in control of the children's perception of what is right, or really going on as far as when they are actually supposed to see their other parent.
So if the parent who is responsible for providing access, such as transportaion to the other parent for court ordered visitation rights, is demonstrating an evil act if they are not being honest qith their children makung them unaware of the plan or schedual according to the law.

Like hell im not

Misplaced Trust

Psychoanalysis would highlight the accompanying paradox that 'the child, it should be remembered, always defends the bad parent more ferociously than the good'. [6] The paradox may help account for what have been called 'trauma bonds...the misplaced loyalties found in exploitive cults, incest families, or hostage and kidnapping situations, or codependents who live with alcoholics, compulsive gamblers or sex addicts'. [7]

Carl Cottee Jr. Has Been Accused Of Beating His Girlfriend’s 4-Year-Old To Death

Carl Cottee Jr. Has Been Accused Of Beating His Girlfriend’s 4-Year-Old To Death May 6, 2013 at 9:20 am by Morbid Carl Cottee Jr. Has Been Accused Of Beating His Girlfriends 4 Year Old To DeathNewport News, VA - Carl Cottee Jr., 23, has been charged with the murder of his girlfriend’s 4-year-old daughter, according to police. Police were called to a home where Cottee had been caring for Madyson Van Cleave Hook while her mother was out. There they found the girl in a bedroom not breathing and showing signs of trauma to her body, according to police spokesperson Holly McPherson. The child was taken to a local hospital where she was pronounced dead from blunt head trauma. Madyson’s grandmother was initially told the girl’s death was an accident, and that Madyson got dizzy after taking a bath, passed out and then hit her head. But that does not explain the bruises and multiple skull fractures the family would later learn the girl had suffered. ”It’s horrible I just can’t imagine her going through that pain,” her grandmother said. “I can hear her saying, ‘I love my Nan Nan.’” Want to hear something infuriating? Madyson’s grandmother also said there was suspicion the girl was being abused after Madyson complained of being locked in a dresser and being left alone. Two weeks ago, Child Protective Services was called in to investigate for signs of abuse in the home, but nothing came of that investigation. Carl Cottee Jr. was arrested and has been charged with murder, child neglect and cruelty and injuries to a child. He is currently residing in the Newport News City Jail. A candlelight vigil was held for Madyson Sunday night where dozens attended and lit candles. Madyson’s father, Shane Van Cleave, says he vows to keep telling his first born’s story while her family says Madyson’s death shows the importance of speaking up and speaking out about child abuse. Read more: http://www.dreamindemon.com/2013/05/06/carl-cottee-jr-accused-beating-girlfriends-4yearold-death/#ixzz2TL6l5AMH Under Creative Commons License: Attribution Follow us: @dreamindemon on Twitter | thedreamindemon on Facebook

Child suffering from extreme emotional damage

Termination of Parental Rights: California

Failure of Reasonable Efforts

"Tactics of Manipulative People"

Watch "Tactics of Manipulative People" on YouTube

Narcissistic Parent

Watch "Narcissistic Parent: Collateral Damage" on YouTube

Torn Apart - Documentary

Watch "Torn Apart - Documentary" on YouTube

Children of Divorce

Watch "Children of Divorce. (video documentary about alienation) - topic: family, society" on YouTube

Alive Beat Dads

Alive Beat Dads

Placed With The Wrong Parent

Custodial arrangement that is detrimental to their well-being.

Nixon, Thomas J.

Caroline Samiezade-Yazd on January 8, 2012 at 6:16 pm This is what is happening to me. I have a reputable doctor who has documented in writing in my medical record that my PTSD is secondary to the loss of my children. With this, I am now going to see if I can find a personal injury attorney who will file a personal injury lawsuit against Alameda County in California. My commissioner’s name is Thomas J. Nixon, if anyone else has this commissioner, and is having these problems, please contact me at ToBeFreeToBeMe@yahoo.com. Please place the word Nixon in the header, in case it goes to spam. Maybe a class action lawsuit can come of it. Thank You

webology at 12:47 PM

Share 0

No comments:

Post a Comment

› Home

‹

http://www.keepingfamiliesconnected.org/blog

“There is no system ever devised by mankind that is guaranteed to rip husband and wife or father, mother and child apart so bitterly then our present Family Court System” – Judge Brian Lindsay Retired Supreme Court Judge I have been pondering what has been happening in the courts lately. I am struck by the [...]

MALICIOUS ALIENATION

Pathological Separation of Parent and Child or Spouse by Intentional Punishment Causing Infliction of Emotional Anxiety and Distress.

BPD Distortion Campaigns

One of the classic behaviors of a person suffering from Borderline Personality Disorder is the vilification campaign. The target is the person against whom the perpetrator Borderline conducts the vilification. The intent is to destroy the target’s reputation and thereby destroy the target’s relationships with family and friends, employers, co-workers, doctors, teachers, therapists, and others. The intent may even be to force the target to leave the community, put the target in prison, or even kill the target. As with so many things involving Borderlines and their typical inability to understand or respect boundaries, there really are no limits. They will use basically any means available to them to cause damage to their target, including denigration, endless disparaging remarks, fabrication, false accusations, and even teaching others (including their children!) to lie on their behalf as part of their vilification campaign.

Distortion Campaigns Not Limited to BPD Victims

People without BPD may practice vilification campaigns, also, but they are often tied to BPD or similar personality disorders, especially Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD). The classic BPD book Stop Walking on Eggshells refers to these as distortion campaigns. This choice of words emphasizes that the campaign employs lies, exaggerations, fictions, partial truths, and other reality distortion techiques. As it is unusual for a Borderline engaging in a vilification campaign to not use distortions, we shall refer to these as distortion campaigns just as the authors of Stop Walking on Eggshells have done.

It’s a myth that only women have BPD. Older research suggested that about 75% of BPD cases occur in women and that about 2% of the population is affected. Newer research shows that the ratio is probably closer still, possibly nearly evenly split, and that as much as 6% of the population may suffer from it.

It can be very difficult to distinguish BPD from similar personality disorders, particular from NPD (Narcissistic Personality Disorder) as both tend to involve a lot of emotional abuse. Many believe that males are more likely to have NPD and females BPD. Other disagree. Psychology is a very subjective science. Gender bias in therapists and researchers often makes it even more subjective.

Please don’t assume if I use a gender-specific pronoun such as “he” or “she” that I mean the statement only applies to men or women. Writing in a gender-neutral manner in English can be awkward at times because the language lacks a truly gender-neutral third person pronoun for people that could replace the use of “he” and “she”. “It” just doesn’t sound right, and repetitively using “he or she” makes for some annoying reading.

Most of what I write here about distortion campaigns applies equally to men and women suffering from BPD or NPD or even a combination of the two as. Recent research shows that BPD and NPD are often present at the same time.

Distortion Campaign Does Not Intend to Help the Target

It’s critical to differentiate between a real distortion campaign and something that may look like one but is not. For instance, Borderlines often have drug and substance abuse problems. If a family member or friend of a Borderline tries to get help for the Borderline by discussing the problems with other family members and friends, this is not a distortion campaign. It is based upon caring about the person and trying to discuss what is going wrong in order to get help. There is not intent to harm. But a Borderline may have a very hard time distinguishing the intent of helping and lack of intent to harm. Such a friend or family member may be accused by the Borderline of conducting a distortion campaign, even though this is not accurate.

Not All Borderlines Practice Distortion Campaigns

It’s important to note that not all Borderlines practice distortion campaigns. Some e